Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 11:10:32 01/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2000 at 05:25:49, Amir Ban wrote:
>On January 11, 2000 at 01:10:56, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>Worst of all, I think he considered Deep Blue to be a micro program with a big
>>box around it. He really had no comprehension of how much better 200 Million
>>NPS is than 200 Thousand NPS. Statments about how {paraphrasing} "computers
>>will never make a move like that" indicate to me that he prepared by playing
>>against micros. That is like preparing for Linares by running through a bunch
>>of games with C club players. Deep Blue will see things that other computers
>>simply will not see without allowing absurd time intervals. If he allowed the
>>micros to think for one week per move he might get something commensurate. But
>>then, the playing experience would not be the same, because he would be
>>operating at a slow, postal rate and have plenty of time to think through the
>>possibilities.
>
>
>This has been said countless times before, and the follow up question: Show us
>one move that Deep Blue (or Deep Thought) made that a micro needs a week to
>find, has never been answered.
Jeremiah Pennery has show several of them, including one recently.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.