Author: Amir Ban
Date: 12:30:46 01/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2000 at 14:10:32, Dann Corbit wrote:
>On January 11, 2000 at 05:25:49, Amir Ban wrote:
>
>>On January 11, 2000 at 01:10:56, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>Worst of all, I think he considered Deep Blue to be a micro program with a big
>>>box around it. He really had no comprehension of how much better 200 Million
>>>NPS is than 200 Thousand NPS. Statments about how {paraphrasing} "computers
>>>will never make a move like that" indicate to me that he prepared by playing
>>>against micros. That is like preparing for Linares by running through a bunch
>>>of games with C club players. Deep Blue will see things that other computers
>>>simply will not see without allowing absurd time intervals. If he allowed the
>>>micros to think for one week per move he might get something commensurate. But
>>>then, the playing experience would not be the same, because he would be
>>>operating at a slow, postal rate and have plenty of time to think through the
>>>possibilities.
>>
>>
>>This has been said countless times before, and the follow up question: Show us
>>one move that Deep Blue (or Deep Thought) made that a micro needs a week to
>>find, has never been answered.
>
>Jeremiah Pennery has show several of them, including one recently.
I missed it. How about a reminder ?
Amir
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.