Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderation: perhaps jarri should be banned also

Author: odell hall

Date: 14:32:12 01/11/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 11, 2000 at 11:58:41, robert michelena wrote:

>For commenting without facts.
>
>I cannot speak for david ballard, but as far as I am concerned, certain
>moderators here took sides when I posted my honest opinion that average, non
>master strength players, could not defeat commmercial chess programs under
>tournament time control.  I am sorry if it caused dismay among certain elements
>here, but that is my honest opinion.

Amen brother!!! This exact thing happened to me, I posted a rather innocent
article wanting to know the reasons why programmers don't sell their programs to
the public, and was insulted about ten times, none of the moderators said a
word, but as soon as I started swinging back then the moderators jumped on my
with all fours!!  There is obviously favoritism, and selective persecution at
this group.  We need moderators who are more inteliigent, less emotional, and
who are not prone to favoritism. Some people here can say anying and insult
anyone, and no one says a word. Then there is others that do absolutely nothing,
but perhaps make a negative implication and the whole group attacks them. There
are obviously some unspoken tabboo's here. I think the number 1 tabboo is never
say anything negative about crafty no matter how honest your opinion is.
Extremly childish to say the least.

>
> These moderators did not comment about the uncivility of the forum when others
>insulted me, but when I said something in my defense, then all of a sudden, I
>was the one who was being obnoxious.  If this is what a civilized forum stands
>for, selective persecution, then by all means, delete me.
>
>Please get the facts straight Jarri.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.