Author: stuart taylor
Date: 19:13:01 01/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2000 at 19:01:49, Charles Unruh wrote: >On January 11, 2000 at 17:32:12, odell hall wrote: > >>On January 11, 2000 at 11:58:41, robert michelena wrote: >> >>>For commenting without facts. >>> >>>I cannot speak for david ballard, but as far as I am concerned, certain >>>moderators here took sides when I posted my honest opinion that average, non >>>master strength players, could not defeat commmercial chess programs under >>>tournament time control. I am sorry if it caused dismay among certain elements >>>here, but that is my honest opinion. >> >>Amen brother!!! This exact thing happened to me, I posted a rather innocent >>article wanting to know the reasons why programmers don't sell their programs to >>the public, and was insulted about ten times, none of the moderators said a >>word, but as soon as I started swinging back then the moderators jumped on my >>with all fours!! > >Amen #2! Just ACT for instance that Robert Hyatt Is not the Omniscient, >Omnipotent authority on ALL chess and computer chess, then MOST of the time and >MOST of the moderators here in my OPINION practically gang rape and stab you in >the back, not to mention that none of the attacks from Hyatt or Hyatt cronies >ever feel in repurcussions when they make lurid and dirty attacks trying to help >their lord and savior out. > >There is obviously favoritism, and selective persecution at >>this group. We need moderators who are more inteliigent, less emotional, and >>who are not prone to favoritism. Some people here can say anying and insult >>anyone, and no one says a word. Then there is others that do absolutely nothing, >>but perhaps make a negative implication and the whole group attacks them. There >>are obviously some unspoken tabboo's here. I think the number 1 tabboo is never >>say anything negative about crafty no matter how honest your opinion is. >>Extremly childish to say the least. >> >>> >>> These moderators did not comment about the uncivility of the forum when others >>>insulted me, but when I said something in my defense, then all of a sudden, I >>>was the one who was being obnoxious. If this is what a civilized forum stands >>>for, selective persecution, then by all means, delete me. >>> >>>Please get the facts straight Jarri. Also, if you say an inocent opinion and you are missunderstood, or for any reason attacked(verbally of cause), that is wrong, but people often feel justified to an extent.Yes it may be childish, but their intent is not evil. But if, after that you take offense and try to give them back, that is a new problem. Revenge. That is even more childish.Aninalistic.Why? because the intention is becoming a bit worse. Less inocent. No offense intended! And I wasn't implying you or anyone. I'm only explaining facts of life, and self-understanding. Again I'm not refering to you at all, but only to your implied logic written above. Stuart Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.