Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 00:38:51 01/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2000 at 18:08:29, Ritter Rost wrote: >On January 11, 2000 at 09:14:57, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote: > > >> >>Please take a closer look at these four games, especially compare game 1+3 and >>2+4. It is a very good example of a program with book learning ability playing a >>program without book learning. S2 has no book learning and I am the only one who >>can be blamed for that. I don't want to complain too much, but in my opinion >>those matches are useless. I have only checked those 4 games but I bet you can >>fing more examples in the other games. Please correct me if I am wrong. >> >>Don't get me wrong. I think that Junior6 is probably very strong, but has also >>an excellent book learing algo, particularly against programs without any form >>of learning. >> >>Stefan >> > >Hello Stefan, > >will Shredder4 be included in the next SSDF list? From my tests it could go >right to the very top, > >Respectfully, Ritter Hi! Yes but probably not in the next list (end of january) Bertil SSDF
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.