Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 02:42:28 01/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2000 at 03:02:43, KarinsDad wrote: >On January 12, 2000 at 02:26:30, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On January 12, 2000 at 01:47:04, KarinsDad wrote: >> >>>PS. And you keep bringing up your unwarranted opinion that Robert Hyatt can get >>>away with anything (not in the post above, but in this thread). This is untrue. >>>He has been warned on multiple occasions by the current moderators to desist >>>when he violates the charter. One difference is that once warned, he stops for a >>>while as opposed to continuing for days and weeks on end. The other major >>>difference is that people rarely send us an Email complaining about him >>>(although it does happen), but we get complaints virtually everytime someone >>>uses major profanity directed at another. So, if you have a problem with his or >>>anybody else's posts, you have nobody but yourself to blame if you do not report >>>violations of the charter to us (and feel we are picking on you, but letting >>>others slide). >> >>Bob hasn't been "warned" about anything, I thought. I've sent him some heads >>up's that I thought might keep him from getting drawn into things with >>imposters, and I think I gave him a hard time about something he said, but you >>make it sound like he is a problem poster, and he's not. >> >>bruce > >Warned might not be the best word, but: > >Robert was Emailed by you on October 16th to "please be careful about saying >this kind of thing."; > >In early November Amir, Christophe, Robert, and Ed went at it and a >Moderation:" post to knock it off was made and I sent Robert a message on >November 1st. > >And yes, you have asked him to avoid getting drawn into things as well. My >point, however, was that when he does go to bat with people, he does get a >message to cool it, either on the forum or via Email, just like everyone else. > >The word "multiple" in my message above was a little strong since I could only >find two such Emails. But the fact is that Robert is a member in good standing >just like everyone else until he crosses the line. And, then he is also treated >just like everyone else. > >I agree with you that he has not been a problem (it's getting late, so my choice >of words is a little faulty). But he is also not treated with favoritism either >and that was my main point. > >KarinsDad :) Why put this in public? I really hate to see this :( Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.