Author: Chessfun
Date: 03:01:28 01/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2000 at 05:42:28, Ed Schröder wrote: >On January 12, 2000 at 03:02:43, KarinsDad wrote: > >>On January 12, 2000 at 02:26:30, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On January 12, 2000 at 01:47:04, KarinsDad wrote: >>> >>>>PS. And you keep bringing up your unwarranted opinion that Robert Hyatt can get >>>>away with anything (not in the post above, but in this thread). This is untrue. >>>>He has been warned on multiple occasions by the current moderators to desist >>>>when he violates the charter. One difference is that once warned, he stops for a >>>>while as opposed to continuing for days and weeks on end. The other major >>>>difference is that people rarely send us an Email complaining about him >>>>(although it does happen), but we get complaints virtually everytime someone >>>>uses major profanity directed at another. So, if you have a problem with his or >>>>anybody else's posts, you have nobody but yourself to blame if you do not report >>>>violations of the charter to us (and feel we are picking on you, but letting >>>>others slide). >>> >>>Bob hasn't been "warned" about anything, I thought. I've sent him some heads >>>up's that I thought might keep him from getting drawn into things with >>>imposters, and I think I gave him a hard time about something he said, but you >>>make it sound like he is a problem poster, and he's not. >>> >>>bruce >> >>Warned might not be the best word, but: >> >>Robert was Emailed by you on October 16th to "please be careful about saying >>this kind of thing."; >> >>In early November Amir, Christophe, Robert, and Ed went at it and a >>Moderation:" post to knock it off was made and I sent Robert a message on >>November 1st. >> >>And yes, you have asked him to avoid getting drawn into things as well. My >>point, however, was that when he does go to bat with people, he does get a >>message to cool it, either on the forum or via Email, just like everyone else. >> >>The word "multiple" in my message above was a little strong since I could only >>find two such Emails. But the fact is that Robert is a member in good standing >>just like everyone else until he crosses the line. And, then he is also treated >>just like everyone else. >> >>I agree with you that he has not been a problem (it's getting late, so my choice >>of words is a little faulty). But he is also not treated with favoritism either3 >>and that was my main point. >> >>KarinsDad :) > >Why put this in public? > >I really hate to see this :( > >Ed My feeling also, why can't this be done in e-mail. Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.