Author: Albert Silver
Date: 05:33:10 01/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2000 at 03:38:51, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>On January 11, 2000 at 18:08:29, Ritter Rost wrote:
>
>>On January 11, 2000 at 09:14:57, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Please take a closer look at these four games, especially compare game 1+3 and
>>>2+4. It is a very good example of a program with book learning ability playing a
>>>program without book learning. S2 has no book learning and I am the only one who
>>>can be blamed for that. I don't want to complain too much, but in my opinion
>>>those matches are useless. I have only checked those 4 games but I bet you can
>>>fing more examples in the other games. Please correct me if I am wrong.
>>>
>>>Don't get me wrong. I think that Junior6 is probably very strong, but has also
>>>an excellent book learing algo, particularly against programs without any form
>>>of learning.
>>>
>>>Stefan
>>>
>>
>>Hello Stefan,
>>
>>will Shredder4 be included in the next SSDF list? From my tests it could go
>>right to the very top,
>>
>>Respectfully, Ritter
>Hi!
>
>Yes but probably not in the next list (end of january)
>
>Bertil SSDF
Which new programs will we see on the list? I know that you are testing a number
(Junior 6, Fritz 6, Shredder 4, etc...) but don't know which ones will have
enough games to appear on the list yet.
Albert Silver
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.