Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: correction...

Author: Charles Unruh

Date: 06:10:53 01/12/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 12, 2000 at 01:08:10, Peter Kappler wrote:

>On January 11, 2000 at 21:41:01, Leon Stancliff wrote:
>
>>  In my opinion the question as to whether the top microcomputer programs can
>>play at grandmaster level has been answered. The average rating for the
>>opponents of Rebel Century in the twenty games actually played was 2510 Elo. The
>>average Mhz rating of the computers was 498. Rebel won by 11-9 which gave it
>>55%.
>
>I think something is wrong with your list of games.
>
>There have been 21 games played at 40/2, with Rebel scoring 5 wins, 10 draws,
>and 6 losses.  Here's a complete list:
>
>Player	        Elo	Rebel	Hardware
>Sorin	        2524	0.5	K6/3-600
>Rohde	        2585	0	K6/3-600
>Rohde	        2585	0.5	K6/3-600
>Hoffman	        2501	0	K6/3-600
>Anand	        2795	0.5	K6/2-450
>Anand	        2795	0	K6/2-450
>Ruzele	        2515	0.5	K6/3-600
>Krivonosov	2432	0.5	P2-400
>Zapolskis	2399	1	K6/2-300
>Grabliauskas	2466	0.5	P2-350
>Sherbakov	2541	1	K6/3-600
>Zagorskis	2486	1	K6/3-600
>Grabliauskas	2466	0	P3-500
>Sakalauskas	2450	0	P2-350
>Krivonosov	2432	0.5	K6/2-300
>Baburin	        2593	0.5	K6/3-600
>Sherbakov	2552	0	K6/3-600
>Russek	        2398	1	K6/3-450
>Russek	        2398	0.5	K6/3-450
>Russek	        2398	0.5	K6/3-450
>Russek	        2398	1	K6/3-450
>
>By my numbers that's a 2491 performance rating.

2491 and you are counting games it lost using a mere P350 forget about the 50
points YOU pretty much say below it might probably get on faster hardware give
it the credit of 9 points!  That's 2500(GM strength)running on good hardware by
your own analysis how can you argue otherwise?

Certainly a strong IM-level
>performance, but not quite GM strength, and well short of what would be
>necessary to actually achieve a GM norm.
>
>Of course, Rebel wasn't playing on the fastest currently available hardware, but
>at 40/2 it doesn't make a huge difference.  How much better it would score on an
>Athlon 750 is another debate entirely - but I seriously doubt it would even
>amount to another 50 ELO points if you're talking about 40/2 games against
>humans.
>
>
>>  The point differential for 55% wins is 35. When we add 35 points to 2510 we
>>have 2545 Elo.  Rebel Century does play at grandmaster level. The question now
>>will become, "Where does the top micro program rate among the world list of
>>grandmasters?"
>>  An Elo rating of 2545 would place Rebel Century at the 219th position out of
>>652 living grandmasters. This places the program in the top third of the GM
>>list. The only real live question now is "How long will it be before the top
>>computers will among the top one hundred?" Will it happen within three years?
>
>To me, it's more interesting to ask how long before it can crack the top 10,
>which is roughly 2700 FIDE.  I think it might still be a very long time.
>
>--Peter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.