Author: Pete Galati
Date: 08:10:28 01/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2000 at 10:28:01, Jeff Anderson wrote: >I thought the point of the moderators was to keep things getting into out of >control nonsense, but instead the moderators seem to very much enjoy >contributing to the nerdly CCC soap opera. They start entire new threads about >a post they have deleted and why they have deleted, and then they reply to that >thread themselves before anyone else. They announce members that have been >suspended in long overly-dramatic public letters. They participate in big >arguments about what dirty word someone has said, or which phrase was >politically incorrect. They bicker more than anyone else in this entire forum. >Generally the moderators are the biggest contributor to mammouth off-topic >threads. > The moderators are doing a bad job, and actually causing more problems for CCC >than would occur if they did not exist at all. The moderators should err on the >side of sins of ommision rather than sins of comission. >I realize this post itself may contribute to the clutter on the CCC message >board, but I hope it is a first step in returning things to a state where the >moderators do not feel it is there duty to post their every thought publicly, >and create a problem much bigger than if they did not exist at all. > >Jeff If you don't want moderators, then here's your forum: news:rec.games.chess.computer no moderators there, hope you'll be happy
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.