Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 09:21:16 01/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2000 at 08:33:10, Albert Silver wrote: >On January 12, 2000 at 03:38:51, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>On January 11, 2000 at 18:08:29, Ritter Rost wrote: >> >>>On January 11, 2000 at 09:14:57, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>>Please take a closer look at these four games, especially compare game 1+3 and >>>>2+4. It is a very good example of a program with book learning ability playing a >>>>program without book learning. S2 has no book learning and I am the only one who >>>>can be blamed for that. I don't want to complain too much, but in my opinion >>>>those matches are useless. I have only checked those 4 games but I bet you can >>>>fing more examples in the other games. Please correct me if I am wrong. >>>> >>>>Don't get me wrong. I think that Junior6 is probably very strong, but has also >>>>an excellent book learing algo, particularly against programs without any form >>>>of learning. >>>> >>>>Stefan >>>> >>> >>>Hello Stefan, >>> >>>will Shredder4 be included in the next SSDF list? From my tests it could go >>>right to the very top, >>> >>>Respectfully, Ritter >>Hi! >> >>Yes but probably not in the next list (end of january) >> >>Bertil SSDF > >Which new programs will we see on the list? I know that you are testing a number >(Junior 6, Fritz 6, Shredder 4, etc...) but don't know which ones will have >enough games to appear on the list yet. > > Albert Silver Junior 6 is for sure, but possibly it's the only one. It's just two weeks to go and to my knowledge we haven't started to test any more new program. Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.