Author: Albert Silver
Date: 12:39:08 01/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 12, 2000 at 12:21:16, Tony Hedlund wrote:
>On January 12, 2000 at 08:33:10, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>On January 12, 2000 at 03:38:51, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>>
>>>On January 11, 2000 at 18:08:29, Ritter Rost wrote:
>>>
>>>>On January 11, 2000 at 09:14:57, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Please take a closer look at these four games, especially compare game 1+3 and
>>>>>2+4. It is a very good example of a program with book learning ability playing a
>>>>>program without book learning. S2 has no book learning and I am the only one who
>>>>>can be blamed for that. I don't want to complain too much, but in my opinion
>>>>>those matches are useless. I have only checked those 4 games but I bet you can
>>>>>fing more examples in the other games. Please correct me if I am wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>Don't get me wrong. I think that Junior6 is probably very strong, but has also
>>>>>an excellent book learing algo, particularly against programs without any form
>>>>>of learning.
>>>>>
>>>>>Stefan
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hello Stefan,
>>>>
>>>>will Shredder4 be included in the next SSDF list? From my tests it could go
>>>>right to the very top,
>>>>
>>>>Respectfully, Ritter
>>>Hi!
>>>
>>>Yes but probably not in the next list (end of january)
>>>
>>>Bertil SSDF
>>
>>Which new programs will we see on the list? I know that you are testing a number
>>(Junior 6, Fritz 6, Shredder 4, etc...) but don't know which ones will have
>>enough games to appear on the list yet.
>>
>> Albert Silver
>
>Junior 6 is for sure, but possibly it's the only one. It's just two weeks to go
>and to my knowledge we haven't started to test any more new program.
>
>Tony
How has it been doing?
A.S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.