Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:04:01 01/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2000 at 15:37:28, Christophe Theron wrote:
>On January 13, 2000 at 14:10:01, Jeremiah Penery wrote:
>
>>On January 13, 2000 at 14:02:44, James T. Walker wrote:
>>
>>>On January 13, 2000 at 09:14:09, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>[Event "Tiger-Diep match"]
>>>>[Site "k6-400"]
>>>>[Date "2000.01.12"]
>>>>[Round "2"]
>>>>[White "Chess Tiger 12.0e"]
>>>>[Black "Diep2"]
>>>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>>>[Opening ""]
>>>>
>>>>{}
>>>>1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.Nc3 Nc6 4.a3 Nxe4 5.Nxe4 d5 6.Bd3 dxe4 7.Bxe4 Nd4 8.c3 Qh4
>>>>9.d3
>>>>Bg4 10.Qa4+
>>>>Bd7 11.Qd1 Bg4 12.Qa4+ Bd7 13.Qd1 Bg4 1/2-1/2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>And now ???
>>>>
>>>>it seems diep always replays the book moves, and
>>>>tiger without book is not learning.
>>>>so - how often shall i reproduce the 2 games ???
>>>
>>>
>>>Hello Thorsten,
>>>Can you please remind me why Tiger is playing without book? I'm sure Vincent
>>>wants this to give his program some advantage but why is it being done?
>>>Jim Walker
>>
>>I think Vincent was whining about how Tiger gets winning positions from book.
>>In response, Christophe said Tiger would play the match without book, so Vincent
>>would quit complaining about it.
>
>
>That's right.
>
>
> Christophe
Would it have made for sense to play say game 1 then at the point
where Tiger left book reverse colors and play game 2 from this
exact same position.
This way both would have got a chance to win from this position,
claimed to be winning positions out of book, then we could have
seen how strong that statement was or wasn't.
Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.