Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:04:01 01/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2000 at 15:37:28, Christophe Theron wrote:
>On January 13, 2000 at 14:10:01, Jeremiah Penery wrote:
>
>>On January 13, 2000 at 14:02:44, James T. Walker wrote:
>>
>>>On January 13, 2000 at 09:14:09, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>[Event "Tiger-Diep match"]
>>>>[Site "k6-400"]
>>>>[Date "2000.01.12"]
>>>>[Round "2"]
>>>>[White "Chess Tiger 12.0e"]
>>>>[Black "Diep2"]
>>>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>>>[Opening ""]
>>>>
>>>>{}
>>>>1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.Nc3 Nc6 4.a3 Nxe4 5.Nxe4 d5 6.Bd3 dxe4 7.Bxe4 Nd4 8.c3 Qh4
>>>>9.d3
>>>>Bg4 10.Qa4+
>>>>Bd7 11.Qd1 Bg4 12.Qa4+ Bd7 13.Qd1 Bg4 1/2-1/2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>And now ???
>>>>
>>>>it seems diep always replays the book moves, and
>>>>tiger without book is not learning.
>>>>so - how often shall i reproduce the 2 games ???
>>>
>>>
>>>Hello Thorsten,
>>>Can you please remind me why Tiger is playing without book? I'm sure Vincent
>>>wants this to give his program some advantage but why is it being done?
>>>Jim Walker
>>
>>I think Vincent was whining about how Tiger gets winning positions from book.
>>In response, Christophe said Tiger would play the match without book, so Vincent
>>would quit complaining about it.
>
>
>That's right.
>
>
> Christophe
Would it have made for sense to play say game 1 then at the point
where Tiger left book reverse colors and play game 2 from this
exact same position.
This way both would have got a chance to win from this position,
claimed to be winning positions out of book, then we could have
seen how strong that statement was or wasn't.
Thanks.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.