Author: allan johnson
Date: 16:23:36 01/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 2000 at 01:24:51, Charles Unruh wrote: >"It is different, that's all. > > Fritz was described as a monster machine and you defeated > it. But Rebel defeated you. How different were these two > machines? > > In my opinion, Fritz is far superior to the other one. > But the day I played Rebel, I was really in bad shape" > >Is he saying that his match with fritz was a far superior match or is saying >that fritz plays far superior chess? also i noted Anand mentioning that he >loses and draws with comps by making a statement to the effect that "I can draw >positions against a computer that i never could against a human" This portion >my suggest he loses sometimes but the poiny of this post is What does he mean by >the first quote? Opinions? I doubt if there is a great deal of difference in playing strength between Fritz6 and Rebel Century overall.Of course each programme handles particular positions in their own way but in battles across the board on the same hardware I doubt whether either programme would demonstate clear superiority over the other. Anand is an intelligent person and would undoubtedly arrive at the same conclusion so my guess is that money has changed hands! Cheers Allan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.