Author: stuart taylor
Date: 20:43:22 01/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 11, 2000 at 22:13:01, stuart taylor wrote: >On January 11, 2000 at 19:01:49, Charles Unruh wrote: > >>On January 11, 2000 at 17:32:12, odell hall wrote: >> >>>On January 11, 2000 at 11:58:41, robert michelena wrote: >>> >>>>For commenting without facts. >>>> >>>>I cannot speak for david ballard, but as far as I am concerned, certain >>>>moderators here took sides when I posted my honest opinion that average, non >>>>master strength players, could not defeat commmercial chess programs under >>>>tournament time control. I am sorry if it caused dismay among certain elements >>>>here, but that is my honest opinion. >>> >>>Amen brother!!! This exact thing happened to me, I posted a rather innocent >>>article wanting to know the reasons why programmers don't sell their programs to >>>the public, and was insulted about ten times, none of the moderators said a >>>word, but as soon as I started swinging back then the moderators jumped on my >>>with all fours!! >> >>Amen #2! Just ACT for instance that Robert Hyatt Is not the Omniscient, >>Omnipotent authority on ALL chess and computer chess, then MOST of the time and >>MOST of the moderators here in my OPINION practically gang rape and stab you in >>the back, not to mention that none of the attacks from Hyatt or Hyatt cronies >>ever feel in repurcussions when they make lurid and dirty attacks trying to help >>their lord and savior out. >> >>There is obviously favoritism, and selective persecution at >>>this group. We need moderators who are more inteliigent, less emotional, and >>>who are not prone to favoritism. Some people here can say anying and insult >>>anyone, and no one says a word. Then there is others that do absolutely nothing, >>>but perhaps make a negative implication and the whole group attacks them. There >>>are obviously some unspoken tabboo's here. I think the number 1 tabboo is never >>>say anything negative about crafty no matter how honest your opinion is. >>>Extremly childish to say the least. >>> >>>> >>>> These moderators did not comment about the uncivility of the forum when others >>>>insulted me, but when I said something in my defense, then all of a sudden, I >>>>was the one who was being obnoxious. If this is what a civilized forum stands >>>>for, selective persecution, then by all means, delete me. >>>> >>>>Please get the facts straight Jarri. > > >Also, if you say an inocent opinion and you are missunderstood, or for any >reason attacked(verbally of cause), that is wrong, but people often feel >justified to an extent.Yes it may be childish, but their intent is not >evil. But if, after that you take offense and try to give them back, that >is a new problem. Revenge. That is even more childish.Aninalistic.Why? >because the intention is becoming a bit worse. Less inocent. >No offense intended! And I wasn't implying you or anyone. >I'm only explaining facts of life, and self-understanding. > Again I'm not refering to you at all, but only to your implied logic >written above. > Stuart Taylor I see no one ever has any comment about character analysis of mine. S.T.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.