Author: george petty
Date: 04:56:02 01/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2000 at 01:37:00, Charles Unruh wrote: >On January 14, 2000 at 00:48:41, John Warfield wrote: > >>On January 14, 2000 at 00:32:23, Charles Unruh wrote: >> >>> Karpov should be dying for some publicity now, or even Khalifman after the >>>nightmare with Leko(my vote though is for Karpov). If Deep Blue(Chip) Wins >>>there would be more sponsorship ready and More enticement and pressure for >>>Kasparov to play. Sometimes one must conceed to do such things when one is the >>>one on the weaker side. >> >> >> I disagree it was Deepblue that won their last encounter not Kasparov. >>Therefore it should be kasparov who plays to prove himself worthy to face >>Deepblue. > > >Why the match didn't prove anything it was the luck of a draw, i win by half a >point. It would be a different story if he had got drummed like Kalifman by >leko 4.5 to 1.5. Further this is not even the exact same deep blue. Everybody >can have an opinion though Very true! It did not prove anything. If I.B.M. had defeated Kasparov, like Leko did Kalifman, then it would have some merit. George
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.