Author: Albert Silver
Date: 06:15:36 01/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2000 at 07:24:42, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>On January 14, 2000 at 07:19:37, Jouni Uski wrote:
>
>>One note: even if this tournament is 40/40 - it is played in P500 - so
>>this means almost same as TOURNAMENT 40/2h in 200 MMX PC!! So no excuses type:
>>my program is better with longer time controls...
>>
>>Jouni
>
>I keep saying that in my opinion there is no significant difference between
>40/40 and 120/40. I also know that some people that always tested at 40 in 2 are
>thinking about switching to 40/40. Maybe there are programs like CST and Diep
>that need really long time controls, but for the rest it is roughly the same, I
>think.
>
>Enrique
Yes, remember that the use of the 40/2h time control was to show how the program
might play against a human OTB. As for showing which program beats other
programs, I agree there is probably NO (or VERY little) difference.
Albert Silver
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.