Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 09:51:30 01/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2000 at 10:24:28, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>On January 13, 2000 at 21:10:25, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>>I should maybe have been more specific. What I meant to say is that
>>>instead of playing with no book play both programs with book.
>>>Then after game 1, reverse colors where Tiger left book. This way
>>>were it a killer book that made it strong and not the engine itself
>>>the result would appear more apparent.
>>>Thanks.
>>
>>
>>Why not...
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>So the order to me is:
>
>after the 1-1 make tiger with book ON and let them play.
>take the 3rd game and let play with changed sides but
>same opening in the fourth, and so on, always changing sides
>but with same opening each 3,5,7,9 the 4,6,8,10 is with changed sides ?
>
>i could do so. this would be better than doing dump
>repeating and only ONE prg. has opening ON-.
>
>
>please agree and i will start the 3rd game !
OK, I agree.
I would first see Vincent agreeing explicitely to your proposition too. Well, he
actually agreed in another post in this thread, so I think it's OK.
If Tiger plays a killer line, then it will be victimized by this line in the
next game. Fair enough.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.