Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 12:19:07 01/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 2000 at 09:32:35, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >From a programmer's point of view it may be the same, but the Kasparov-DB >rematch has the whole world as an audience, and in this whole world everyone >knows IBM Deep Blue as the machine that beat Kasparov, no one aside from >computer chess people and academic circles know Hsu's project. How to justify to >them that a new XXX "mystery box" plays the world champion? Put it this way: in >this context, Kasparov has nothing to win, everything to lose and then no reason >to play. > >Enrique If such a match were to be held, whatever Hsu came up with might be billed as "the successor to IBM's Deep Blue". Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.