Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: FH replies to Owen Williams

Author: James Robertson

Date: 20:47:51 01/14/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 14, 2000 at 13:04:54, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On January 14, 2000 at 12:40:45, Frederic Friedel wrote:
>
>>FH Hsu sent me the following:
>>
>>This will be my last message on the subject and I will keep it short.
>>
>>I found the initial conditions listed by Owen reasonable, but there were
>>some details that needed to be worked out.  One issue was whether
>>the match would be a title match or not.  Personally, I prefer a non-title
>>match, but the potential sponsors I knew seemed to be only interested
>>in a title match.  My subsequent mails were mainly trying to resolve
>>this issue.  At one point, I decided to write an open letter and see whether
>>there were sponsors who would settle for a non-title match.  Owen
>>might have misunderstood my intent.  Eventually, Owen said what
>>appeared to be a definitive no to my simple question of whether Mr.
>>Kasparov was still interested in a new match.
>>
>>I did state a deadline in a message to Owen.  The deadline was
>>my self-imposed time limit of when I should move on if I could not
>>reach a mutual understanding with Mr. Kasparov.  It was given as an
>>FYI.  However, in retrospect, it was a mistake that I mentioned the
>>deadline as it could easily be misinterpreted.
>>
>>I will not defend whether I was serious about the match proposal.  I
>>will just state the following facts.  I spent over a year and some of
>>my own money to get the right to the chess chip, and I was
>>prepared to spend another year and half of my life working furiously
>>to make the match happen.  Finally, I would like to point out that
>>I have all the resources to build a machine without further funding if
>>need be.  It was the necessary condition before IBM management
>>would even consider granting me the chess chip license.
>
>Oh well, yet only wanting to play Kasparov with it. How naive.
>Need to bring some money then. What about another GM of say 2700 who
>only costs $20k at most or something?
>
>There are now 3 official world champions
>   - Kasparov   (PCA)
>   - Khalifman  (las vegas)
>   - Karpov     (he officially has the title for another year)
>
>Then there are a bunch of strong GMs who are all willingly to compete
>anything and anyhow:
>   - Anand
>   - Shirov
>
>Very strong & cheap:
>   - Kramnik
>   - Morozevich
>   - Leko
>   - Adams
>   - Ivanchuk
>   - Bareev
>   - Topalov
>
>All those dudes are except for Karpov (2696) and Khalifman (2656) above 2700.
>
>If one really wants to compete, it's easy to start a match with one of
>those cool dudes. About 1/100 of the price of Kasparov, and playing stronger
>against computers.
>
>It directly 'qualifies' a computer to play against Kasparov in case you win,
>though i consider that as unlikely. You sure can find more sponsorship when
>winning a serious match. Very likely none of them is asking things like:
>"first show me how it plays".
>
>Kasparov also is proving weekly how he plays those dudes.
>
>Not searching for some other opponents as well i would consider as a
>clear signal of weakness.

I would like totally jam to see a way cool match with one of those 'dudes'.

:)

James



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.