Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 12:46:35 01/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 2000 at 13:29:41, James Robertson wrote: >On January 15, 2000 at 12:54:15, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On January 15, 2000 at 09:40:51, James Swafford wrote: >> >>>If you use 20 bits to probe, why not just store the other 44 bits in the >>>table as a checksum? You already know the other 20 bits match.... >> >>What I do in mine is I use the bottom however many bits to probe, and I store >>the top 32 bits. So I lose some bits unless my table hits 2^32 elements, which >>is not likely for a while at least. > >What is your collision rate? > >James I have no idea. I think that it makes sense that I check, but I haven't. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.