Author: Howard Exner
Date: 03:43:57 01/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2000 at 03:42:27, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >On January 15, 2000 at 13:56:04, Pierre Bourget wrote: > >>He then addressed the question of playing >>Fritz 6 in the Frankfurt Giants’. "I’ve informed the organisers that I won’t >>take part if Fritz 6 plays. I well remember the trouble that Genius gave me at >>London Intel tournament, 1994. I feel that computers playing in these >conditions >>would be very unfair for humans. > >Interesting comment by Gary. I am very curious what the organisers of >the Frankfurt Giants will do. Basically, it seems to be a choice between >Kasparov and Fritz! > >Personally I must say that I agree with Kasparov. Computers should not >play in such blitz tournaments anymore. We all know that they are too >strong for humans now, using these time controls. So what is the point >of letting a computer taking part again and again. > >The real challenge for a computer program is the normal time control: >40 moves in 2 hours. Here it is still a long way before a computer >will be clearly stronger than a IGM. For me there is one big topic: >Please give us AEGON back! Why did the Aegon man vs machine fold?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.