Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:55:07 01/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2000 at 10:32:34, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >Diep also plays Rc7 like deep blue, > >[d]6rk/1N3p1p/5q2/3Q4/3p4/PP1n1pPP/5P2/2R3K1 w - - > >I only see positional evaluation >difference between the moves Rc6 and Rc7 though. > >Score Rc7 even goes a bit lower at ply=17, >i saw diep starting at ply 18, >without getting a fail high for Rc6 at 17, >so this move passes at 17 ply. > >Diep ran at a PII450 without much extensions. Most important to mention: >diep ran without singular and without threat extensions and without any >chance for double extensions. > >Allocated 79999984 bytes hashtables >Permanent brain is on > # move freq games score*2 learn ==> huge cache > D I E P 2.00 > >black timeleft=27:46.40.00 > - = - = - = r k ... 1 ... > = N = - = o = o ... 2 ... > - = - = - q - = ... 3 ... > = - = Q = - = - ... 4 ... > - = - o - = - = ... 5 ... > O O = n = o O O ... 6 ... > - = - = - O - = ... 7 ... > = - R - = - K - ... 8 ... >white timeleft=27:46.40.00 >white to move > > # move freq games score*2 learn ==> game cache > D I E P 2.00 >clean >Clearing all Hashtables... >anal >Analysis mode is on >process 0: engineflags = 0 denktime=10000000 maxtime=10000000 >00:00 3 (0) 1 1.37 Rc1-c2 >00:00 5 (0) 1 1.55 Rc1-c7 >++ c1-c6 >00:00 190 (0) 1 1.65 Rc1-c6 Qf6-f4 >00:00 314 (0) 1 1.75 Rc1-d1 >00:00 556 (0) 2 1.51 Rc1-d1 Rg8-g5 >++ c1-c6 >00:00 628 (0) 2 1.65 Rc1-c6 Qf6-f4 >++ c1-c7 >00:00 838 (0) 2 1.78 Rc1-c7 Rg8-f8 >++ c1-c4 >00:00 1077 (0) 2 2.36 Rc1-c4 Nd3-f4 Qd5xd4 Nf4xh3 Kg1-f1 >00:00 1444 (0) 3 2.36 Rc1-c4 Nd3-f4 Qd5xd4 Nf4xh3 Kg1-f1 >++ c1-d1 >00:00 1952 (0) 3 2.39 Rc1-d1 Nd3-f4 Qd5xd4 Nf4xh3 Kg1-f1 >00:00 4163 (0) 4 1.71 Rc1-d1 Nd3-f4 Qd5xf3 Nf4xh3 Kg1-g2 Nh3-f4 Kg2-g1 >++ c1-c7 >00:00 13711 (0) 4 2.04 Rc1-c7 Qf6-f4 Qd5-d6 Nd3-e5 >++ c1-c6 >00:00 16260 (0) 4 2.19 Rc1-c6 Qf6-g7 Qd5xf3 Nd3-e5 >00:01 28689 (0) 5 2.93 Rc1-c6 Qf6-e5 Qd5xe5 Nd3xe5 Rc6-f6 Rg8-a8 >00:02 51503 (0) 6 3.23 Rc1-c6 Qf6-e5 Qd5xf3 Qe5-e1 Kg1-g2 Qe1-e8 Nb7-d6 >00:03 93692 (0) 7 3.29 Rc1-c6 Qf6-f4 Rc6-c8 Qf4-f6 Qd5-d6 Qf6xd6 Rc8xg8 Kh8xg8 N >b7xd6 >00:05 146957 (0) 8 3.29 Rc1-c6 Qf6-f4 Rc6-c8 Qf4-f6 Qd5-d6 Qf6xd6 Rc8xg8 Kh8xg8 >Nb7xd6 >00:10 286220 (0) 9 3.28 Rc1-c6 Qf6-f4 Rc6-c8 Qf4-e5 Qd5xe5 Nd3xe5 Rc8xg8 Kh8xg8 >a3-a4 d4-d3 Kg1-f1 >00:50 1220520 (0) 10 3.26 Rc1-c6 Qf6-f4 Rc6-c8 Qf4-e5 Qd5xe5 Nd3xe5 Nb7-d6 d4-d3 > Rc8xg8 Kh8xg8 Nd6-e4 Kg8-f8 >02:51 4042531 (0) 11 3.27 Rc1-c6 Qf6-f4 Rc6-c8 Qf4-e5 Qd5xe5 Nd3xe5 Rc8xg8 Kh8xg >8 Nb7-d6 d4-d3 Nd6-e4 Kg8-f8 Kg1-f1 >07:47 10847814 (0) 12 3.13 Rc1-c6 Qf6-f4 Rc6-c8 Qf4-e5 Qd5xe5 Nd3xe5 Rc8xg8 Kh8x >g8 Nb7-d6 Kg8-f8 Kg1-f1 f7-f6 Nd6-f5 d4-d3 >17:15 24259356 (0) 13 3.13 Rc1-c6 Rg8-g5 Qd5-d8 Qf6xd8 Nb7xd8 Kh8-g7 Rc6-c7 Rg5- >d5 Nd8xf7 Kg7-f6 Nf7-h8 Rd5-b5 >29:51 42116199 (0) 14 2.73 Rc1-c6 Rg8-g5 Qd5-d8 Qf6xd8 Nb7xd8 Kh8-g8 Rc6-f6 Nd3- >c1 b3-b4 d4-d3 Kg1-f1 Rg5-d5 Nd8-c6 >01:12:41 102480667 (0) 15 2.53 Rc1-c6 Rg8-g5 Qd5-d8 Qf6xd8 Nb7xd8 Kh8-g8 Rc6-f6 >Nd3-c1 b3-b4 d4-d3 Rf6-d6 Rg5-g6 Nd8-b7 >++ c1-c7 >01:48:47 152996794 (0) 15 2.56 Rc1-c7 Nd3-f4 Qd5xf3 Nf4xh3 Kg1-g2 Nh3-f4 Kg2-f1 >Qf6-a6 Rc7-c4 Nf4-g6 Qf3-d5 f7-f6 Nb7-c5 Qa6xa3 Qd5xd4 >04:54:15 415236782 (0) 16 2.72 Rc1-c7 Nd3-f4 Qd5xf3 Nf4xh3 Kg1-g2 Qf6xf3 Kg2xf3 >Nh3-g5 Kf3-e2 Kh8-g7 Nb7-d6 Rg8-d8 Rc7-c6 f7-f6 Ke2-d3 >07:15:58 619248119 (0) 17 2.53 Rc1-c7 Nd3-f4 Qd5xf3 Nf4xh3 Kg1-g2 Qf6xf3 Kg2xf3 >Nh3-g5 Kf3-e2 Kh8-g7 Rc7-d7 Rg8-b8 b3-b4 Rb8-a8 Nb7-a5 Ng5-e6 >state The reason I mentioned this move was on the day of the game, we had several micros providing analysis. None agreed with DB. In 1997.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.