Author: John Warfield
Date: 02:42:16 01/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2000 at 05:16:45, Andrew Williams wrote: >On January 18, 2000 at 04:57:14, John Warfield wrote: > >>On January 18, 2000 at 04:45:33, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >> >>>On January 18, 2000 at 04:30:51, John Warfield wrote: >>> >>>>On January 18, 2000 at 02:54:50, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 18, 2000 at 01:25:23, John Warfield wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 17, 2000 at 16:46:52, Rajen Gupta wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>I remember when i 1st started reading the web comp chess reports-rebel8 was the >>>>>>>new champ-by a huge margin.since then there is no convincing evidence that later >>>>>>>versions of rebel are stronger than rebel8. perhaps someone who does extensive >>>>>>>testing like Mark Young or enrique can tell us (on the basis of actual tests and >>>>>>>comp vs comp games please, not merely on subjective impressions)the following: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>which is the strongest version of rebel >>>>>>> >>>>>>>is rebel getting progressively weaker with each version or is this merely >>>>>>>because other programmes are getting disproportionately stronger? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>if rebel is actually getting weaker then what is the purpose of releasing new >>>>>>>versions? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>rajen >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Your obviously on Crack Cocaine! >>>>> >>>>>your - your barn is on fire >>>>>you're - you're out of your league >>>>>they're - they're going to get whacked if they keep that up >>>>>their - their barn is on fire >>>>>there - there it is >>>>>loose - his belt was loose, and that led to disaster >>>>>lose - we're going to lose this one >>>>>it's - it's the end of a very long day >>>>>its - its engine konked out, and I had to walk home >>>>> >>>>>Have fun. >>>>> >>>>>bruce >>>> >>>> >>>> Sorry Bruce >>>> >>>> >>>> I missed the meaning of your post? Just a little bit over my ahead can you >>>>clarify the purpose of the above in plain language? >>> >>>I think he was being facetious. (Uh, oh! Looks like _I_ need a spelling lesson >>>now...Or is that spelled correctly? :)) >>> >>>You wrote "Your obviously...", where it should've been "You're obviously...". >>>Well, at least you spelled cocaine right. >> >> >> >> Is that all?? I am disappointed I didn't know bruce could be so petty? > >I think you should consider what your original post contributed to the group. > >Andrew Well you can probally ask that questions about 90% of the post here. Not every post has to be a constribution does it? Where in the CCC charter does it say a post must contribute? My contribution was to point out that the poster was nuts says that rebel has declined.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.