Author: John Warfield
Date: 03:05:46 01/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2000 at 05:49:11, Andrew Williams wrote: >On January 18, 2000 at 05:42:16, John Warfield wrote: > >>On January 18, 2000 at 05:16:45, Andrew Williams wrote: >> >>>On January 18, 2000 at 04:57:14, John Warfield wrote: >>> >>>>On January 18, 2000 at 04:45:33, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 18, 2000 at 04:30:51, John Warfield wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 18, 2000 at 02:54:50, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On January 18, 2000 at 01:25:23, John Warfield wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On January 17, 2000 at 16:46:52, Rajen Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I remember when i 1st started reading the web comp chess reports-rebel8 was the >>>>>>>>>new champ-by a huge margin.since then there is no convincing evidence that later >>>>>>>>>versions of rebel are stronger than rebel8. perhaps someone who does extensive >>>>>>>>>testing like Mark Young or enrique can tell us (on the basis of actual tests and >>>>>>>>>comp vs comp games please, not merely on subjective impressions)the following: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>which is the strongest version of rebel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>is rebel getting progressively weaker with each version or is this merely >>>>>>>>>because other programmes are getting disproportionately stronger? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>if rebel is actually getting weaker then what is the purpose of releasing new >>>>>>>>>versions? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>rajen >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your obviously on Crack Cocaine! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>your - your barn is on fire >>>>>>>you're - you're out of your league >>>>>>>they're - they're going to get whacked if they keep that up >>>>>>>their - their barn is on fire >>>>>>>there - there it is >>>>>>>loose - his belt was loose, and that led to disaster >>>>>>>lose - we're going to lose this one >>>>>>>it's - it's the end of a very long day >>>>>>>its - its engine konked out, and I had to walk home >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Have fun. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>bruce >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry Bruce >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I missed the meaning of your post? Just a little bit over my ahead can you >>>>>>clarify the purpose of the above in plain language? >>>>> >>>>>I think he was being facetious. (Uh, oh! Looks like _I_ need a spelling lesson >>>>>now...Or is that spelled correctly? :)) >>>>> >>>>>You wrote "Your obviously...", where it should've been "You're obviously...". >>>>>Well, at least you spelled cocaine right. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Is that all?? I am disappointed I didn't know bruce could be so petty? >>> >>>I think you should consider what your original post contributed to the group. >>> >>>Andrew >> >> >> Well you can probally ask that questions about 90% of the post here. Not every >>post has to be a constribution does it? Where in the CCC charter does it say a >>post must contribute? My contribution was to point out that the poster was nuts >>says that rebel has declined. > >Surely you have a reason for thinking this? Why not tell us your reason for >thinking that Rebel hasn't declined, rather than just making a meaningless >assertion? > >Andrew Well who made you the CCC police? Just mind your own business I can express myself how I see fit, whatever you consider it a contrubution or not so just bug off!!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.