Author: Andrew Williams
Date: 06:43:44 01/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2000 at 06:05:46, John Warfield wrote: >On January 18, 2000 at 05:49:11, Andrew Williams wrote: > >>On January 18, 2000 at 05:42:16, John Warfield wrote: >> >>>On January 18, 2000 at 05:16:45, Andrew Williams wrote: >>> >>>>On January 18, 2000 at 04:57:14, John Warfield wrote: >>>> >>>>>On January 18, 2000 at 04:45:33, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On January 18, 2000 at 04:30:51, John Warfield wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On January 18, 2000 at 02:54:50, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On January 18, 2000 at 01:25:23, John Warfield wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On January 17, 2000 at 16:46:52, Rajen Gupta wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>I remember when i 1st started reading the web comp chess reports-rebel8 was the >>>>>>>>>>new champ-by a huge margin.since then there is no convincing evidence that later >>>>>>>>>>versions of rebel are stronger than rebel8. perhaps someone who does extensive >>>>>>>>>>testing like Mark Young or enrique can tell us (on the basis of actual tests and >>>>>>>>>>comp vs comp games please, not merely on subjective impressions)the following: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>which is the strongest version of rebel >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>is rebel getting progressively weaker with each version or is this merely >>>>>>>>>>because other programmes are getting disproportionately stronger? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>if rebel is actually getting weaker then what is the purpose of releasing new >>>>>>>>>>versions? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>rajen >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Your obviously on Crack Cocaine! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>your - your barn is on fire >>>>>>>>you're - you're out of your league >>>>>>>>they're - they're going to get whacked if they keep that up >>>>>>>>their - their barn is on fire >>>>>>>>there - there it is >>>>>>>>loose - his belt was loose, and that led to disaster >>>>>>>>lose - we're going to lose this one >>>>>>>>it's - it's the end of a very long day >>>>>>>>its - its engine konked out, and I had to walk home >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Have fun. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>bruce >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry Bruce >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I missed the meaning of your post? Just a little bit over my ahead can you >>>>>>>clarify the purpose of the above in plain language? >>>>>> >>>>>>I think he was being facetious. (Uh, oh! Looks like _I_ need a spelling lesson >>>>>>now...Or is that spelled correctly? :)) >>>>>> >>>>>>You wrote "Your obviously...", where it should've been "You're obviously...". >>>>>>Well, at least you spelled cocaine right. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is that all?? I am disappointed I didn't know bruce could be so petty? >>>> >>>>I think you should consider what your original post contributed to the group. >>>> >>>>Andrew >>> >>> >>> Well you can probally ask that questions about 90% of the post here. Not every >>>post has to be a constribution does it? Where in the CCC charter does it say a >>>post must contribute? My contribution was to point out that the poster was nuts >>>says that rebel has declined. >> >>Surely you have a reason for thinking this? Why not tell us your reason for >>thinking that Rebel hasn't declined, rather than just making a meaningless >>assertion? >> >>Andrew > > > Well who made you the CCC police? Just mind your own business I can express >myself how I see fit, whatever you consider it a contrubution or not so just bug >off!! I'm not the CCC police, I am just an ordinary member. One of the moderators pointed out one deficiency in your original post. You seemed unable to see that there was another, namely that it had no content. To put this more clearly, just saying that you think someone is nuts is not (in my view) an appropriate post in this forum. I pointed out this second deficiency. However, what I wanted was to ensure that the ratio of useful posts (like the one you responded to) to less-useful posts (like your response) remains high in this forum. However, all I've done is to generate a whole thread of non CC posts; perhaps we should agree to differ and both stop wasting everyone's time? Andrew PS I don't think telling someone to "bug off" is very appropriate either. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.