Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 13:42:43 01/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2000 at 14:15:14, Rajen Gupta wrote: >I asked about rebel geting weaker, progressively-and every body said ''that's >unlikely, or not true'' or words to that effect but no-one has actually shown >games or tournaments where subsequent versions of rebel are doing progressively >better-also there is no evidence that strength against other computers, means >weakness against humans-first of all there are very few games played by >successive versions of rebels against humans as eveidence of this dubious theory >and secondly fritz 5/6 has the best results against both humans and against >computers!! > >I think this theory is like saying that a not so pretty girl gas a very good >personality!! > >rajen gupta Maybe you should turn it around, and prove for yourself if Rebel 8 is the stronger one. Let us assume that Rebel 8 and Century have basicaly the same engine, the tuneability of Century has the potential to make it stronger than Rebel 8. Just to tune the "selectivety" and "knowledge" (lazy eval) parameters, together with the "search technique" can keep me busy every time and most of the times gives the result I´m looking for. It does not play better mostly, but solves problems better. Long time analysing is what I mostly use my programs for. Ernst-J.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.