Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 14:27:42 01/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2000 at 14:24:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On January 18, 2000 at 09:33:32, Andreas Stabel wrote: >>I've been digging in some old directories and have come up with the following: >>8 ;r3;r;b;k1/;p;p;q2;p;p;p/2;b1;pb2/8/6q1/1p1b3p/p1p2pp1/r2r2k1/40 >> >>White to move >> >>8 R * - * R B K * >>7 P P Q - * P P P >>6 - * B * P b - * >>5 * - * - * - * - >>4 - * - * - * q * >>3 * p * b * - * p >>2 p * p * - p p * >>1 r - * r * - k - >> >> a b c d e f g h >> >>Source: Gufeld-Osnos, USSR 1978. >> >>The move played was 1. Bh7, but as it turns out 1. Bh7 might not be the >>best move. Osnos defended poorly and got slaughtered. With best black >>defence, white only maintains a positional edge after 1. Bh7 Kh7 2. Qh5 >>Kg8 3. Rd4 Bf3! (with the idea of Qxc2, and then Q to king side to defend >>the king). DT-2 prefers to play c4, which threatens Bh7 for real. >> >>Regards >>Andreas Stabel > > >Incredible "digging". :) The original message from Hsu to R.G.C. from where this comes is at: http://info.ex.ac.uk/sheu/DR/Trawl/ComputerProb.html Jeremiah :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.