Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: MOD: squad -- a response that's odd.

Author: Albert Silver

Date: 16:00:47 01/18/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 18, 2000 at 12:24:19, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On January 18, 2000 at 05:00:26, John Warfield wrote:
>[snip]
>>  Since Bruce wants to go around starting a trend to correct every little
>>spelling mistake that is made, I may as well join the crowd.  I think it should
>>read:
>>
>>
>>  You are absolutely right, Bruce
>
>It was a *joke* for crying out loud.  It was tongue-in-cheek.  A vacuous post
>contained (among other things) spelling errors.
>
>"At least you could try to spell your backhanded remarks correctly."
>
>Get it?
>
>Actually, it's pretty funny.  If you like sarcasm.  Otherwise, it't not.  Of
>course, I could be wrong, and it might be a real attempt at better grammar,
>spelling, and punctuation.  In that case, I have a long way to go.
>
>Anyway, let's all be nice.  Courtesy is free (which is cheap at twice the
>price).
>
>A glance at some Nettiquette FAQ's might be a nice idea.  I don't think we want
>to try to sterilize CCC and chrome plate the whole thing.  But if we sit around
>and try to think up snappy retorts, we will never address any of the issues,
>will we?
>
>Now, it turns out that it is pretty difficult for people to be tolerant.  A poet
>once said, "Intoleration is a state no tolerant man can tolerate."
>(He wasn't a very good poet).  Maybe we really are too thick headed to tolerate
>differences between men and women.  Maybe we really are too thick headed to
>tolerate different backgrounds and religions.  On the day after a man is
>remembered in the US for a hope that people "would be judged by the content of
>their character" that is really too bad.  But we really should be open minded
>enough to _at least_ tolerate each other's opinions.
>
>And if an *opinion* gets us so hot under the collar that all we can do is poke
>back at the *person* then perhaps we feel insecure [with reason] about our own
>position.  I always feel that I should be able to defend my beliefs and feelings
>rationally.  If I get angry, that (to me) is a sign that I am afraid I might be
>wrong.  Time to take a deeper look.

:-)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.