Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Conspiracy -- conshmiracy

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 20:34:57 01/18/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 18, 2000 at 22:34:08, george petty wrote:
> How you can come up with all that from my statements is FANTASTIC.  Boy I
> have seen people take things out of context, but I have to say this tops them
> all.  I have never seen so much jealousy, and no sense of fair play.  No
> wonder the rest of the world laughs at Americans.  Don't wait for the FACTS,
> just prejudge.  No body was talking about "conspiracy".  But you have all the
> answers.  NONSENSE!!  I did not say I did.  I say lets wait and see what the
> FACTS are. Hopefully we are not trying to write fiction on this post, but
> what is based on FACTS.

No need to start insulting Americans here. Your country (whatever it is) still
buys all our crap. =P

As for conspiracies, it's just an issue of semantics. Kasparov thought the DB
team was CONSPIRING against him, i.e., cheating. See? Problem solved.

In the US, we consider people innocent until proven guilty. I'm sure you can see
the wisdom of this policy. So why are you so eager to consider Kasparov's claim,
when he clearly has no evidence?

-Tom



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.