Author: blass uri
Date: 07:42:41 01/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2000 at 18:58:17, Rajen Gupta wrote: >On January 18, 2000 at 18:11:51, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>On January 18, 2000 at 16:09:09, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On January 18, 2000 at 14:15:14, Rajen Gupta wrote: >>> >>>>I asked about rebel geting weaker, progressively-and every body said ''that's >>>>unlikely, or not true'' or words to that effect but no-one has actually shown >>>>games or tournaments where subsequent versions of rebel are doing progressively >>>>better-also there is no evidence that strength against other computers, means >>>>weakness against humans-first of all there are very few games played by >>>>successive versions of rebels against humans as eveidence of this dubious theory >>>>and secondly fritz 5/6 has the best results against both humans and against >>>>computers!! >>> >>>Your questions answer is too obvious. Of course it doesn't get weaker. >>>it remains playing the same moves in the same positions. of course it >>>doesn't SUDDENLY play a weaker move now. > >Rajen says >i do think that programmes can get weaker than their predecessors-it is an >accepted fact (time and again mentioned in this forum)that the Genius3 is the >srongest genius; It is not accepted fact. Genius5's ssdf rating is bigger than Genius3's ssdf rating on p90 also for Mchess pro-the strongest one is not the latest-and as >you rightly pointed out rebel 6 is stronger thn 7; fritz 3 was stronger than 4 It is not clear. There is almost no difference between Fritz3 and Fritz4 in the ssdf list. >and 5.32 is stronger than 6(the original. not 6.69) again it is not clear. both programs did similiar results in Enrique's test suite. Fritz5.32 did better results against tiger but we need more opponents and more games to know. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.