Author: walter irvin
Date: 09:51:20 01/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 2000 at 12:36:29, stuart taylor wrote: > Is it possible to say that there hasn't been any completely clear improvement >in playing strength of recent programs, compared to most of >1999? > Each one is good in one aspect and bad in another? Or is there all >round superiority in any of the new programs over and above all those >from before a bit before the turn of the century? >Stuart Taylor the programs get better inching along ,there is indeed something missing .programs are not going to jump in elo anymore until programers solve the problem of computer learning .mhz can only take you so far after that memory must be a key factor in getting better .i have been dissapointed by programs sucking every ounce of ram and making 100% to 400% in processor power smp ,but they almost totaly neglect 1 thing a computer does better than any human (remember) ie hard drive .i know they have tried with egtb and big opening books but that will not be enough .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.