Author: Heiko Mikala
Date: 14:41:12 01/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Stuart! On January 19, 2000 at 03:00:01, stuart taylor wrote: >If these brilliant wins are also against top computer oponents,then that is >a very great thing which I didn't know about. Here are some results MChess achieved in my current ongoing tournament: (played on two equal computers) MChess Pro 8 - Nimzo 7.32: ..... 1.5-0.5 MChess Pro 8 - Rebel Century: .. 1.5-0.5 MChess Pro 8 - Hiarcs 7.32: .... 1.0-1.0 MChess Pro 8 - CM 6000: ........ 1.0-1.0 MChess Pro 8 - Shredder 4.00: .. 1.0-1.0 and some more. There were some match-losses too of course, for example against Fritz 6. But as you can see, it scores well against other top programs and many of the wins were really brilliant ones with very nice king-side attacks. >If the results are great >except when it is flawed, or didn't get a chance to flare up, then in some >ways and in some games it must be the strongest computer player there is. > So in that case, they already have the right idea, so why don't they >find a way of correcting its faults whilst not detracting from its strong >points? > Then it should be top shouldn't it? I'm eagerly waiting for the release of MChess Pro 9, you know... ;-) Greetings, Heiko.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.