Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Was the question to difficult??

Author: blass uri

Date: 00:21:59 01/20/00

Go up one level in this thread

On January 19, 2000 at 19:03:58, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On January 19, 2000 at 12:53:07, blass uri wrote:
>[snip]
>>I assume deep blue did not cheat but the fact that kasparov is better than other
>>humans does not make cheating impossible.
>Anything is possible.  But that does not make it plausible.  Or credible.
>
>>I believe that anand is a weaker player than kasparov and also that Fritz is a
>>weaker player than kasparov but the team of anand and Fritz is better than
>>kasparov.
>I am not convinced of this (at 40/2 -- in postal chess that is another matter).
>What reason do you have to believe this?  I never see Kasparov blunder.

I saw that anand blundered in the match against kasparov and he could avoid the
blunder with the help of computer program.

Uri

• Re: Was the question to difficult?? Dann Corbit 00:43:31 01/20/00
  • Re: Was the question to difficult?? blass uri 01:26:44 01/20/00
    • Re: Was the question to difficult?? Dann Corbit 00:11:58 01/21/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.