Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 00:43:31 01/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2000 at 03:21:59, blass uri wrote: >On January 19, 2000 at 19:03:58, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On January 19, 2000 at 12:53:07, blass uri wrote: >>[snip] >>>I assume deep blue did not cheat but the fact that kasparov is better than other >>>humans does not make cheating impossible. >>Anything is possible. But that does not make it plausible. Or credible. >> >>>I believe that anand is a weaker player than kasparov and also that Fritz is a >>>weaker player than kasparov but the team of anand and Fritz is better than >>>kasparov. >>I am not convinced of this (at 40/2 -- in postal chess that is another matter). >>What reason do you have to believe this? I never see Kasparov blunder. > >I saw that anand blundered in the match against kasparov and he could avoid the >blunder with the help of computer program. Yes, but have you ever seen it the other way around? Kasparov is a lean, mean, chess-machine.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.