Author: blass uri
Date: 01:26:44 01/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2000 at 03:43:31, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 20, 2000 at 03:21:59, blass uri wrote: > >>On January 19, 2000 at 19:03:58, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On January 19, 2000 at 12:53:07, blass uri wrote: >>>[snip] >>>>I assume deep blue did not cheat but the fact that kasparov is better than other >>>>humans does not make cheating impossible. >>>Anything is possible. But that does not make it plausible. Or credible. >>> >>>>I believe that anand is a weaker player than kasparov and also that Fritz is a >>>>weaker player than kasparov but the team of anand and Fritz is better than >>>>kasparov. >>>I am not convinced of this (at 40/2 -- in postal chess that is another matter). >>>What reason do you have to believe this? I never see Kasparov blunder. >> >>I saw that anand blundered in the match against kasparov and he could avoid the >>blunder with the help of computer program. > >Yes, but have you ever seen it the other way around? Kasparov is a lean, mean, >chess-machine. Anand won the first not drawn game against kasparov. Anand could win the match if he knew to avoid losing. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.