Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Conspiracy -- conshmiracy

Author: blass uri

Date: 05:48:16 01/20/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 20, 2000 at 08:25:49, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On January 20, 2000 at 00:45:56, blass uri wrote:
>
>>On January 19, 2000 at 21:13:19, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>><snipped>
>>>Of course Kasparov did the same thing (h6 in round 6 is one that comes to
>>>mind, resigning in game 2 is another.)
>>
>>I do not think that h6 in round 6 was the mistake of kasparov in round 6.
>>The mistake is that he played something that he was not prepared to play.
>>
>>I read that he thought 15 minutes of his b5 in round 6 when the position was
>>known from theory.
>>
>>He could do the same at home in his preperation if h6 was a prepared line.
>>
>>Uri
>
>
>The position for b5 was 'known'.  It was known to be lost.  :)  He didn't
>expect Ne6 most likely, but even if DB had played it, I'm sure he was convinced
>he could win, because he could beat Fritz with black.

I do not think that he was convinced about it because he knew that deeper blue
is better than fritz and I am not sure that he was convinced that he can beat
fritz if fritz is using 24 hours per move instead of 3 minutes per move.


>
>h6 leads to a game that everyone considers dead lost for black.  As a result,
>I would annotate that move as h6??, or perhaps against a computer, as h6?!.

Not everyone.

I did not consider it as dead lost and also deeper blue did not evaluate the
position as winning for white.

If you look at Deeper blue logfiles you can see that deeper blue evaluated the
position after b5 as only a small advantage for white.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.