Author: Amir Ban
Date: 12:47:02 01/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2000 at 20:28:54, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On January 20, 2000 at 09:15:20, Amir Ban wrote: > >>There were indeed some PV's in moves 36 & 37 that looked like typos. The Rxf6 >>line could be explained in this way. There was another which looked weird in a >>different way and I think needed a different theory. > >Are you really arguing that the logs were manufactured? That sounds really >extreme. > >bruce I don't think the logs were manufatured, and didn't say they were. I think the transposition table theory may explain the Rxf6 line, but there are other PV lines that are illogical in a different way, like the line at at T=82 for move 36 2nd game, where it needs to be explained how the move Qa6a7 can be best for white. Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.