Author: Martin Grabriel
Date: 19:57:05 01/21/00
Go up one level in this thread
The software in head says : "For both sides, 3 pieces (the Queen, the King's Rook , and King's Knight) are mirror image to each other. A good program would evaluate the position of the 3 pieces and consider attack on the h-file...White's adv over black is that its Bishop is already aiming at the h6 square while Black's has not done the same at the h3 square yet....also, since it is white to move, a pawn storm with the h and g pawns will caused Black to think deep.." (just then my software crashed...that's all). On January 21, 2000 at 22:01:14, Peter Kappler wrote: >On January 21, 2000 at 20:50:03, Sune Larsson wrote: > >>...of Zurich International 1953 saw Taimanov facing Geller in King's Indian. >>After Geller's 9th move we have the following position: >> >>[D]r1bqr1k1/pp1n1pbp/3p1np1/2pPp3/2P1P3/2N2N2/PP3PPP/R1BQRBK1 w - - 0 1 >> >>Bronstein thinks this position is better for white as it ensures white >>greater freedom to maneuver within his own lines, since he has three ranks, >>while black has only two. Do you think (know) that this pawnformation - >>white: c4-d5-e4 black: c5-d6-e5, is easier to handle for a computerprogram, >>playing white rather than coping with the black piecies?? >> >>Sune > >Hi Sune, > >I think most programs will handle both of those pawn structures poorly. These >positions require lots of piece manuevering and careful timing of the pawn >levers. > >If I had to pick a side for a computer to play, it would be White, but only >because of the space advantage that Bronstein mentioned. > >--Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.