Author: walter irvin
Date: 05:52:57 01/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2000 at 08:12:38, Frank Schubert wrote: >Rating list: > > Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws > > 1 Junior 6.0 : 2675 75 73 60 65.0 % 2567 36.7 % > 2 Fritz 6a : 2673 75 77 60 65.0 % 2565 33.3 % > 3 Nimzo 7.32 : 2607 56 85 60 44.2 % 2647 48.3 % > 4 Shredder 4 : 2599 90 66 60 51.7 % 2587 33.3 % > 5 Rebel-Tiger 12.0e : 2594 87 47 60 54.2 % 2565 58.3 % > 6 Hiarcs 7.32 : 2594 66 87 60 45.8 % 2622 35.0 % > 7 Century : 2494 70 61 80 30.6 % 2635 33.8 % > >(Source: ELOStat 1.0) > > >The elo ratings of the programs become more and more stable. The results of the >last two matches, Tiger-Nimzo (10-10) and Junior-Century (15-5), are in a very >good agreement with their Elo's reached before. Junior and Fritz roughly >70 points ahead of Nimzo, Shredder, Tiger and Hiarcs (difference between these >programs only 13 points). Century still at the end with a distance of >100 points. Meanwhile all error margins are reduced to less than 90 points. >Tiger still with the highest relative number of draws. It lost only a few games >and therefore its lower error margin (47) is significantly smaller than >the upper one (87). > >Frank to me this some what hard to believe ,who would have thought century would score so low .but to be fair these are the best of the best programs .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.