Author: blass uri
Date: 06:35:24 01/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2000 at 08:52:57, walter irvin wrote: >On January 22, 2000 at 08:12:38, Frank Schubert wrote: > >>Rating list: >> >> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >> >> 1 Junior 6.0 : 2675 75 73 60 65.0 % 2567 36.7 % >> 2 Fritz 6a : 2673 75 77 60 65.0 % 2565 33.3 % >> 3 Nimzo 7.32 : 2607 56 85 60 44.2 % 2647 48.3 % >> 4 Shredder 4 : 2599 90 66 60 51.7 % 2587 33.3 % >> 5 Rebel-Tiger 12.0e : 2594 87 47 60 54.2 % 2565 58.3 % >> 6 Hiarcs 7.32 : 2594 66 87 60 45.8 % 2622 35.0 % >> 7 Century : 2494 70 61 80 30.6 % 2635 33.8 % >> >>(Source: ELOStat 1.0) >> >> >>The elo ratings of the programs become more and more stable. The results of the >>last two matches, Tiger-Nimzo (10-10) and Junior-Century (15-5), are in a very >>good agreement with their Elo's reached before. Junior and Fritz roughly >>70 points ahead of Nimzo, Shredder, Tiger and Hiarcs (difference between these >>programs only 13 points). Century still at the end with a distance of >>100 points. Meanwhile all error margins are reduced to less than 90 points. >>Tiger still with the highest relative number of draws. It lost only a few games >>and therefore its lower error margin (47) is significantly smaller than >>the upper one (87). >> >>Frank > >to me this some what hard to believe ,who would have thought century would score >so low .but to be fair these are the best of the best programs . to be fair there is probably also an autoplayer error (mainly for rebel century). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.