Author: blass uri
Date: 07:47:42 01/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2000 at 09:46:41, Albert Silver wrote: >On January 22, 2000 at 09:30:50, blass uri wrote: > >>On January 22, 2000 at 08:02:55, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>On January 22, 2000 at 03:36:29, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>>On January 22, 2000 at 01:51:56, Shanti wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi >>>>> >>>>>This is a team competition. Some teams have a computer (4 out of 12) so we will >>>>>have some computer vs. computer matches. Nothing wrong with it. >>>> >>>>I believe that it is a mistake for 2 of the teams to use a computer if they care >>>>about the result of their teams. >>>> >>>>I believe that humans can do better than Fritz and Deep Junior. >>> >>>What? A mere master better than a program? Or a grandmaster whom the programs >>>are at _least_ equal to, or so I am bludgeoned with. How is this possible? I >>>must say I am _shocked_ to the bones. >>> > >>There are many GM's in the teams of Deep Junior and Fritz and the 5th board of >>them is a GM or at least a strong IM. >>This is the reason that I believe that a computer cannot help them. >> >>The case is different with the teams of Rebel and Shredder. >> >>Uri > >Well, considering that many have been arguing that the programs are easily of GM >strength, saying a strong IM is a better option is somewhat of a contradiction >to this, no? > > Albert Silver Not exactly contradiction because the opponent team has the right to choose the player to play against the computer and they have not the right to choose the player to play against the strong IM. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.