Author: Steve McRiley
Date: 14:32:57 01/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2000 at 16:54:00, Peter McKenzie wrote: >On January 22, 2000 at 14:58:02, Steve McRiley wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>1. Shredder > >I heard this was going to be Shredder version 2 (not the version 4 that won the >1999 World Comp Champs), in which case I don't think it should be seeded #1. If >it is version 4, then I think it should be seeded #1. It will be version 3 :) >>2. Ferret >>3. Nimzo >>4. Crafty >>5. Diep > >I know Diep is a strong program, but I don't understand how it is seeded in >front of LambChop. LambChop finished a point in front of Diep at the 1999 World >Computer Chess Champs and in the ICC Tournament LambChop will be on faster >hardware too. > >I'm not too worried about this seeding, but would like to know the logic behind >it. Logic? Sorry, Im not into that :). Seriously, I dont really know. I dont think it really a problem if a program is seeded one or two places wrong but if everyon agree on this Im open to changes. >>6. ZarkovX >>7. LambChop >>8. Insomniac >>9. Little Goliath >>10. PostModernist >>11. Amateur >>12. Hossa >>13. EXchess >>14. Grok >>15. GnuChess >>16. Bringer >>17. Galahad >>18. Tinker >>19. Averno >>20. Shrike >> >>The seedings are pretty hard to do. The pairings will be done with a >>swiss system so it is probably not deadly important to have the >>seedings 100% correct (if that is even possible to do). > >Thanks for doing a tough job. No problem. Lets just hope this will be a nice event :) /McRiley - ICC
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.