Author: Lonnie Cook
Date: 15:23:12 01/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2000 at 17:32:57, Steve McRiley wrote: >On January 22, 2000 at 16:54:00, Peter McKenzie wrote: > >>On January 22, 2000 at 14:58:02, Steve McRiley wrote: >> >>>Hi, > >>> >>>1. Shredder >> >>I heard this was going to be Shredder version 2 (not the version 4 that won the >>1999 World Comp Champs), in which case I don't think it should be seeded #1. If >>it is version 4, then I think it should be seeded #1. > >It will be version 3 :) Yes, it is, I asked Net and he told me PLUS 3 is the only ver out by Stef that is automated > >>>2. Ferret >>>3. Nimzo >>>4. Crafty >>>5. Diep >> >>I know Diep is a strong program, but I don't understand how it is seeded in >>front of LambChop. LambChop finished a point in front of Diep at the 1999 World >>Computer Chess Champs and in the ICC Tournament LambChop will be on faster >>hardware too. >> >>I'm not too worried about this seeding, but would like to know the logic behind >>it. > >Logic? Sorry, Im not into that :). Seriously, I dont really know. >I dont think it really a problem if a program is seeded one or two places wrong >but if everyon agree on this Im open to changes. > >>>6. ZarkovX >>>7. LambChop >>>8. Insomniac >>>9. Little Goliath >>>10. PostModernist >>>11. Amateur >>>12. Hossa >>>13. EXchess >>>14. Grok >>>15. GnuChess >>>16. Bringer >>>17. Galahad >>>18. Tinker >>>19. Averno >>>20. Shrike >>> >>>The seedings are pretty hard to do. The pairings will be done with a >>>swiss system so it is probably not deadly important to have the >>>seedings 100% correct (if that is even possible to do). >> >>Thanks for doing a tough job. > >No problem. Lets just hope this will be a nice event :) > >/McRiley - ICC
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.