Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: next deep blue

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 15:59:03 01/22/00

Go up one level in this thread


On January 22, 2000 at 17:55:28, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>Please send a check for $500.00 to:
>I will send you one copy of a program that will run on your PC, and will
>say "hello from Deep Blue for the PeeCee" when you start it up.
>The point being that "Deep Blue for a PC would _not_ be Deep Blue, and
>I don't think _anybody_ would be fooled by the idea that it is...

This is stupid and you know it. It is 100% possible to make Deep Blue for
Windows 98, it would just be a few thousand times slower than the "official" DB.
OF COURSE you will not confuse anybody into thinking that their $800 Gateway
Family PC is as good as IBM's Supercomputer, but that is not the point at all.
The point is that DB beat Kasparov, so it's incredibly cool to run the DB
algorithms on your PC. If FHH sold a PC version of DB, he will have thousands of
customers who aren't even sure how to play chess, but still think DB is great.

>According to reported numbers, "DB" has 100K lines of C.  Which would need
>serious porting since there is no SP-type hardware to use.  And then it would

So there's a lot of SP-ish assembly in it, or what? I don't see what the big
deal is.

>need an eval written that takes about 40,000 clocks for the long path thru it.

Actually, FHH should already have a fast version of the evaluation function in
software. Otherwise, how did he design it? How did he tune it? Presumably he
would want his thing to play as well/fast as possible vs. GM Benjamin...

-Tom



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.