Author: Steve
Date: 23:21:16 01/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2000 at 18:55:43, Fernando Villegas wrote: >I know is not a pleasant idea, but maybe is useful. I think is not enought we >can propose people to moderation post and then to vote for our favourites, but >we should have the chance to write whom are the guys we definitely we think >should'nt be moderators. It is not enought not to vote for someone; we could >exclude -according our views- people we just does not like or thinks are >unfitted for any reason, like me. If only the silence is the alternative to >someone we do not consier fine, then it could happen that a guy that produces >bad feelings in many people here could be elected if just half a dozen people >like his style. I suppose this does not need to be public. Just to email to >steven and then he can discount each negative vote from the positive one. Yes, >yes, it is ugly but we could avoid that way the action of cliques that feel >comfortable with guys that are not specially loved. >Prepared to be flamed and hated, but who cares... >fernando Seems to me that too many posts in this club are already devoted to the tedious topic of who doesn't approve of whom, and why. Why encourage more of that?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.