Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 00:22:08 01/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2000 at 03:03:18, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On January 23, 2000 at 01:46:54, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>Is the voting going to be like last time when everyone could vote for all the >>nominated people. >> >>I do not like this way, and protested against this to Steve last election >> >>I think that there should be only 3 votes maximum allowed. I know of no other >>voting where you can vote for all parties. > >If someone is silly enough to vote for all the candidates, the votes will >effectively cancel out anyway. Nothing is being accomplished by voting for >everyone. If you don't care who gets elected, but you know you do _not_ like >one of the candidates, you can vote for everyone but that one. Nothing is gain from voting for everyone which is why we should not be allowed to do it in the first place. In the last election there were people who said that they voted for everyone cause they did not want to let anyone down, which I said back then was a wasted vote > >I think this way works out fine. :) >Besides, it would be too difficult to really set a limit at three. (How would >you suggest doing it?) As said in another post, the two elections before the last one (which this method was introduced) worked fine. So lets take it back to the old way
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.