Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 12:49:17 01/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2000 at 15:22:58, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On January 23, 2000 at 14:27:02, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>Life doesn't always work this way. You can make the clearest argument in the >>world and still not "win." The person you are arguing with can ignore your >>points, confuse the issue, change the topic, etc. >> >>Here's my original question, which started this whole argument: if FHH knows how >>to make such a terrific evaluation function, why doesn't he put one in a PC >>program and make a lot of money from it? > >(I think :-) I've stayed out of this thread for a while, but now that it's >refocusing, I'll stick in my opinion (based on the recent correspodence that can >be found at TWIC). > >Hsu does not care. He is done. DB won a match. He and GK's agent did not >come to terms on a new match. He will go and do something else for a change. > >Dave Yeah, this is the feeling that I get, too. I just have to wonder why he doesn't write up a description of DB's eval function. If it lives up to the hype, then it would be a big step forward in computer chess. -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.