Author: Albert Silver
Date: 20:24:57 01/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2000 at 20:06:27, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>On January 23, 2000 at 19:55:08, Tom Kerrigan wrote:
>
>>It doesn't look like I can change Bob Hyatt's mind about Deep Blue, so there's
>>really no point in arguing. I have other things to do with my time.
>>
>>I still firmly believe that Hyatt has overhyped DB, but there's nothing I can do
>>about it.
>>
>>I would be happy to discuss DB via private e-mail, if anybody is still
>>interested.
>>
>>-Tom
>
>Well let's not forget Bob is the only one defending deep blue here.
Depends on what you mean. I believe its play was inconsistent and would have
been considerably better had it been better tuned. That said, I also believe
that it had no peers by a long shot. Saying the program could have been better
than its minimum 2650 strength isn't much of a put-down when the best
competition is still trying to prove it's at 2500. Put me on your list if you
please. I'd love to see any analysis you might have.
Albert Silver
>I'll add you to my CC list if i have tested/produced again some analysis
>at the kasparov-deep blue matches.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.