Author: Harald Faber
Date: 01:21:15 01/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
Thx to the moderators for deleting my message. So I do it again with another topic, maybe they didn't like "rubbish" as topic. On January 23, 2000 at 17:54:07, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>As earlier mentioned Tiger lost 12 times in the same line as black, because of a >>narrow opening-book. No games was exactly the same but it was to late to do >>anything, Tiger was lost in a few moves after this line. > >1. you let the new versions play against older versions of the same >program , or let the same program play on fast machines against >slower machines. thats nonsense. Nonsense. Neither J6 nor Tiger 12 is an OLD version, right? >2. you don't delete the doubles ! here you even count 12x the same opening !!! Own fault. If I play against you and you repeat the same lousy loosing opening line again and again, you deserve the loss and can be called stupid. >3. you only let the new programs play against new other software >(or - as stupid, see point 1). But you never test against a big >variety of programs on same fast hardware. You don't have a right to demand anything. They do it VOLUNTARILY. Some of them use their machines for other things so that they sometimes can only test 200<->450MHz. But when they do it, they play programs on 200MHz who have a well defined ELO because of VERY many games. Nothing wrong with it. >therefore your results are ot serious. :-))) You accuse me for not accepting other results than mine or results that don't fit into my wishes or so, now you don't accept results that don't fit to yours. Doesn't it remind you on s.th.? You are a really hopeless guy. (How long will this post survive? Why am I gonna deny voting?)
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.